I am taking a course in copyright education from the ALA, and I thought I'd share my response to a discussion question (paraphrased) here and tailored for my situation:
It's decided that a lawyer is not the right person to conduct copyright education for faculty and staff at the college. What kind of person is the right person for this role?
A lawyer may not be the best person to do this kind of educational work at a school for the following reasons:
1. Unnecessary expense; legal advice should only be necessary for a school in high risk and other unusual situations.
2. Lawyers tend to the risk-averse side of the issue, in my experience, and may be less inclined to a balanced view.
3. The advice of lawyers is not necessarily better than a person well-versed in the issue, because their job is to advise, not give concrete answers, and that advice can be correct or not. Only a judge tell...
In educational settings, peers are often the best people to do the day-to-day work of this sort, because it builds on a trust that hopefully already exists in relationships between colleagues. This position is always a bit delicate and has the unpleasant role of sometimes bearing bad news, so a good working relationship is essential to keeping people from "going rogue" and avoiding dealing with the topic at all. Since a good basic (and continuing) education in the subject of copyright is all that may be needed for someone in this role, anyone with the interest and inclination could fulfill it, though someone like a librarian or media specialist who is involved in the issue on a daily basis, may work out better. IMO formal training is not always necessary if the person is diligent with their self-study, but a basic course is recommended.
It's decided that a lawyer is not the right person to conduct copyright education for faculty and staff at the college. What kind of person is the right person for this role?
A lawyer may not be the best person to do this kind of educational work at a school for the following reasons:
1. Unnecessary expense; legal advice should only be necessary for a school in high risk and other unusual situations.
2. Lawyers tend to the risk-averse side of the issue, in my experience, and may be less inclined to a balanced view.
3. The advice of lawyers is not necessarily better than a person well-versed in the issue, because their job is to advise, not give concrete answers, and that advice can be correct or not. Only a judge tell...
In educational settings, peers are often the best people to do the day-to-day work of this sort, because it builds on a trust that hopefully already exists in relationships between colleagues. This position is always a bit delicate and has the unpleasant role of sometimes bearing bad news, so a good working relationship is essential to keeping people from "going rogue" and avoiding dealing with the topic at all. Since a good basic (and continuing) education in the subject of copyright is all that may be needed for someone in this role, anyone with the interest and inclination could fulfill it, though someone like a librarian or media specialist who is involved in the issue on a daily basis, may work out better. IMO formal training is not always necessary if the person is diligent with their self-study, but a basic course is recommended.